12 juillet 2007

Radio-Cadenas Israël Moyen-Orient Palestine Québec Terrorisme

Comment Radio-Canada souligne la guerre du Liban c'étant déroulé il y a 1 an ?

Avec un reportage digne d'Al-Manar, la télévision du Hezbollah !

Sur un fond de musique mélodramatique, tout en présentant exclusivement des images de bombardements israéliens, on nous montre le témoignage d'enfants libanais. Je ne nie pas que des libanais ont souffert lors de cette guerre, mais la rigueur journalistique la plus élémentaire aurait voulu qu'on nous présente les 2 côtés de la médaille.

Absolument rien n'a été dit sur les tirs de roquettes du Hezbollah et rien n'a été dit sur l'opération commando du Hezbollah en sol israélien. Pire encore, on laisse entendre qu'Israël est allé en guerre sans avoir de casus belli.

Bref, un "reportage" avec les israéliens dans le rôle du monstre et le Hezbollah, personnalisé par des enfants, dans le rôle de la victime innocente. Un "reportage" qui réaffirme l'idée malsaine voulant que les "arabes" aient le monopole de la souffrance.

De mon côté, voici comment je souligne la guerre du Liban:

National Post
The rise of Quebecistan

MONTREAL – In his Montreal Gazette column yesterday, Don MacPherson projected a worrying Quebec trend with startling candour: "It's finally becoming respectable again to express support for terrorists."

So it has. On Sunday, 15,000 Quebecers, mostly Lebanese-Canadians, marched for "justice and peace" in Lebanon. That sounds benign, but in fact the march was a virulently anti-Israel rally, and scattered amongst the crowd were a number of Hezbollah flags and placards. Leading the parade were Bloc Quebecois chief Gilles Duceppe, Liberal MP Denis Coderre, PQ chief Andre Boisclair, and Amir Khadir, spokesman for the new far-left provincial party, Solidarite Quebec.

All four politicians had signed a statement by the organizers the day before the march, in which Israel is lambasted for its depredations in Lebanon, Gaza and the West Bank — but the word "terrorism" is never mentioned, nor Hezbollah assigned any blame for the war.

In their speeches at the conclusion of the march, Messrs. Coderre and Duceppe did not condemn terrorism, did not mention Israel's right to defend itself, and spoke only of Lebanese civilian suffering. As a sop to the Quebec-Israel Committee, which had taken out full-page ads calling on the march's leaders to condemn terrorism, however, they called for the disarming of Hezbollah as part of a negotiated ceasefire.

For this, they were roundly booed by the crowd.

These politicians are playing a dangerous game. They have no political support from Jews (who are all federalists), so have nothing to lose in courting anti-Israel Arab groups. There are at least 50,000 Lebanese-Canadians in the Montreal area. We can expect those numbers to swell as Hezbollah-supporting residents of southern Lebanon cash in on their Canadian citizenship and flee to the safety of Quebec. Under the circumstances, it may be politically convenient for some left-wing Quebec politicians to stoke fires of enthusiasm for Hezbollah — an organization officially classified as a terrorist group by the Canadian government. Yet it would be disastrous for the future of the province.

But after the thumping they took from the Conservatives in the last federal election, Quebec separatists are desperate for votes, and apparently not too morally fussy about how they get them. Their official endorsement of last week's one-sided document and their prominent presence at the march was a calculated appeal to dangerous elements in Quebec society. As MacPherson also pointed out in his column, "if [their support for the statement and the march] did not invite Hezbollah sympathizers to participate, it also contained nothing to discourage them from doing so."

Left-wing Quebec intellectuals and politicians (Pierre Trudeau being an obvious example) have always enjoyed flirtations with causes that wrap themselves in the mantle of "liberation" from colonialist oppressors — including their very own home-grown Front de Liberation du Quebec (FLQ), which gave them a frisson of pleasure as it sowed terror throughout Canada in the late '60s with mailbox bombs, kidnappings and a murder. Their cultural and historical sympathy for Arab countries from the francophonie — Morocco, Algeria, Lebanon — joined with reflexive anti-Americanism and a fat streak of anti-Semitism that has marbled the intellectual discourse of Quebec throughout its history, has made Quebec the most anti-Israel of the provinces, and therefore the most vulnerable to tolerance for Islamist terrorist sympathizers.

Think about what this would mean if Quebec ever were to become independent, and detached from the leadership of politicians who know the difference between a democracy and a gang of fanatical exterminationists. You can bet that Hezbollah would be off the official terrorism list by Day two of the Republic of Quebec's existence. By Day three, word would go out to the Islamosphere that Quebec was the new "Londonistan," to cite the title of a riveting new book by British journalist Melanie Phillips, chronicling the rise of militant Islam in her country.

Complacent Canadians think it can't happen here. It won't if our political class takes its cue from the principled Stephen Harper rather than the shameless Quebec politicians who led that pro-terrorist rally. Harper needs Quebec votes every bit as much as Messrs. Duceppe and Boisclair if he expects to achieve a majority government in the next federal election, but unlike them, he isn't willing to sell his soul.

The devil is always on the lookout for the moral relativism that signals a latter-day Faust, and it seems he has found some eager recruits amongst Quebec's most prominent spokespeople.

12 juillet 2007

Société de consommation Économie En Chiffres En Images International

Quelques chiffres intéressants sur la consommation de drogue au 4 coins de la planète:





World Drug Report

12 juillet 2007

Trop de chefs, pas assez d’indiens Économie En Chiffres Québec

Ils ont été nombreux cette semaine à dénoncer l'immobilisme de Montréal. Ça débuté avec Gilbert Rozon, pour se poursuivre avec Alain Simard pour finalement voir Normand Legault se joindre à la parade.

Le problème tient à peu de chose. Depuis les fusions-défusions, Montréal est devenu un capharnaüm bureaucratique absolument ingérable:


En tout et partout, il y a 218 conseillers municipaux pour administrer l'ile de Montréal. Pour gérer la province de Québec, on a besoin de 125 députés. Toronto, qui compte grosso modo 1 millions d'habitants de plus que Montréal, n'a besoin que de 45 échevins.

Conseil municipal, conseil d'arrondissement, conseil d'agglomération, conseil de villes reconstituées: comment voulez-vous faire tourner efficacement une administration qui compte autant d'intervenants. Ironie suprême, les fusions avaient précisément pour but de donner à Montréal "une voie unique"…

Et ce n'est pas tout, le projet de loi de Nathalie Normandeau prévoit alourdir encore plus l'administration de la métropole.

Qui aura le courage de mettre un terme à la récréation ?