Antagoniste


19 septembre 2012

Le gouvernement Harper attaque le Québec Canada Iran Revue de presse

The Vancouver Sun

-

Canada a haven for persecuted gay Iranians
The Vancouver Sun

Canada has likely welcomed more than 100 gay refugees from Iran since taking on gay rights in 2009, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said Friday after his government announced that standing up for gay rights on the inter-national stage would be among Canada’s foreign policy priori-ties going forward.

In a speech before the Montreal Council on Foreign Relations, Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird discussed a range of human rights topics, including Canada’s efforts to combat forced marriages among young girls and the global criminalization and persecution of homosexuals.

A week after severing relations with Iran by pulling Canadian diplomats from Tehran and sending Iranian diplomats in Canada packing, Baird also offered kudos to Kenney for « working to make Canada a safe haven for Iran’s persecuted gay community. »

Kenney said Canada’s efforts included getting about 800 resettled refugees a year out of Turkey, virtually all Iranian.

Homosexuality is punishable by death in Iran, and many gays and lesbians have fled to neighbouring Turkey. There they can file a claim with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, which then works with countries like Canada on resettlement. For a little over a year, Canada has also been assisting sponsored gay refugees with resettlement costs, he said.

On voit bien que le gouvernement Harper n’a aucun respect pour les valeurs québécoises.

Trêve de sarcasme… Mentionnons simplement que bien peu de médias québécois ont jugé bon rapporter cette nouvelle…


9 janvier 2012

Islamofascisme Coup de gueule Iran Revue de presse

Haaretz

-

Iranian cleric calls Facebook ‘un-Islamic’, membership a ‘sin’
Haaretz

An Iranian ayatollah has said that the social networking service Facebook was un-Islamic and being a member of it a sin, the ISNA news agency reported Saturday. In Iran, it is common for senior clerics to be asked about their stance on certain social issues and whether these issues are compatible with Islamic norms. Their answers are regarded as a form of decree.

ISNA on Saturday broadcast coverage of the response of Ayatollah Lotfollah Safi-Golpaygani, a senior cleric, to the question about Facebook and Iranian membership in the social networking service.

« Basically, going to any website which propagates immoralities and could weaken the religious belief is un-Islamic and not allowed, and membership in it is therefore haram (a sin), » the ayatollah replied. « Only the use of websites propagating religious criteria and not leading to any kind of ethical immoralities is of no problem, » he added. The country recently established a cyberpolice unit to better police the internet and even plans to introduce its own national internet, though this has been postponed several times.

Mais allez savoir pourquoi, nos médias préfèrent nous dire que c’est Israël qui n’est pas démocratique…


7 septembre 2011

Le mollah Michael Moore Coup de gueule Gauchistan Iran Revue de presse

The Washington Times

-

Michael Moore, rethink your trip to Iran
The Washington Times

American filmmaker Michael Moore has asked for permission to travel to Iran to attend Cinema Verite, an Iranian international festival for documentary films, according to Mehr News, the mouthpiece news agency of Iran’s Islamic regime.

Mr. Moore should know that Iranian citizens have no rights. Women are subjected to flogging for failing to wear the Islamic hijab; men are beaten for drinking, even in the privacy of their home. People suffer amputation for stealing; they are stoned for adultery; and rape, torture and hanging are common for speaking out against the clerics. Thousands of Iranian girls, boys, poets, writers, activists, teachers, artists and others from every walk of life remain in Iranian prisons without the right to defend themselves.

The very cinema festival that Mr. Moore wants to endorse is subjected to extreme censorship by the Guidance Ministry, which decides which films will be shown and which will be banned. Many movies don’t make it to the screen because they promote free thinking or give a hint of what freedom really means. Many directors and actors end up in prison because they try to defend the rights of the people.

More recently, one of the most influential Iranian filmmakers, Jafar Panahi, was imprisoned – because he supported the aspirations of the Iranian people for freedom and had sympathized with the youths who had protested the fraudulent 2009 presidential elections. The secret police arrested him in March of 2010 along with his wife, children and friends. He was sentenced to prison and barred from making movies for 20 years.


24 juin 2011

Quand les fous prennnent le contrôle de l’asile… Coup de gueule Iran Revue de presse

The Daily Telegraph

-

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says Europe ‘stealing Iran’s rain’
The Daily Telegraph

Moments after the Iranian president made the startling claim at the inauguration of a dam in a central province, it started to rain.

« Western countries have designed plans to cause drought in certain areas of the world, including Iran, » Mr Ahmadinejad said in the city of Arak in Markazi province.

« According to reports on climate, whose accuracy has been verified, European countries are using special equipment to force clouds to dump » their water on their continent, he said. By doing so, « they prevent rain clouds from reaching regional countries, including Iran, » Mr Ahmadinejad charged.

Mr Ahmadinejad also recalled an article by « a Western politician, » whom he did not identify, in which « droughts in some regions spanning from Turkey and Iran to east of Asia are predicted for the next 30 years. »

« The regions (referred to in) the article … include countries whose culture and civilisation frighten the West, » Mr Ahmadinejad said in support of his argument. Iranian leaders claim on a daily basis that Western countries, led by arch-foe United States, devise « plots » to undermine the Islamic republic and to impede its economic and scientific development.


20 avril 2011

Divisions arabes Iran Moyen-Orient Revue de presse Terrorisme

Arab Times

-

Iranian agenda Syria’s burden
Arab Times

Ever since Damascus formed a strategic alliance with Tehran, it has ceased to be the pulsating heart of Arabism, as it was known in the mid-20th century. It has become a mere implementation tool for Iran. At every stage, it has always been with the other side.

In Yemen, Damascus has ignored the massacre committed by the Houthis. In Gaza, it has allowed the Mullah regime to tear apart the Palestinians, leading to an unprecedented bloodbath. There was no protest whatsoever from Syria when Iran committed atrocious acts in Saudi Arabia. The oldest Arab capital did not express support for Bahrain during the implementation of the inordinate plan of the enemy. In Kuwait, the Iranian spy network was uncovered, but Damascus did not utter a word of support.

Syria has transformed willfully into a front house garden for Iran in the region under the guise of resistance, confrontation and opposition to Israel. For 40 years, we have never heard a gun shot towards Golan and it has not been liberated by the Syria-Iran alliance. Syria has not allowed the Arab nations to solve the Palestinian crisis. It rather confronted the Palestinians to prevent the execution of peaceful resolutions. It has been calling for indirect talks with Israel not to liberate Golan, but to buy time for the Iranian nuclear project.

H/T: Le Blog de David Ouellette


20 avril 2010

Tout s’explique… Iran Revue de presse

The New York Times

-

Iranian Cleric: Promiscuous Women Cause Quakes
The New York Times

A senior Iranian cleric says women who wear immodest clothing and behave promiscuously are to blame for earthquakes.

Iran is one of the world’s most earthquake-prone countries, and the cleric’s unusual explanation for why the earth shakes follows a prediction by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that a quake is certain to hit Tehran and that many of its 12 million inhabitants should relocate.

« Many women who do not dress modestly … lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which (consequently) increases earthquakes, » Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi was quoted as saying by Iranian media. Sedighi is Tehran’s acting Friday prayer leader.

« What can we do to avoid being buried under the rubble? » Sedighi asked during a prayer sermon Friday. « There is no other solution but to take refuge in religion and to adapt our lives to Islam’s moral codes. »

Minister of Welfare and Social Security Sadeq Mahsooli said prayers and pleas for forgiveness were the best  »formulas to repel earthquakes. »


5 novembre 2009

Avec nous ou contre nous États-Unis Iran Revue de presse

Wall Street Journal

-

Obama on Tehran’s Democrats
The Wall Street Journal

Tens of thousands of protestors yesterday braved police batons and tear gas canisters in the streets of Iranian cities to denounce their theocratic rulers and call for a change of regime. In spite of repression by the Basiji thugs and the West’s short attention span, the Green Revolution lives on.

On this, the 30th anniversary of the hostage taking at the U.S. Embassy, their message was to a large degree intended for America and President Obama. The opposition hijacked the day, usually an occasion to denounce the Great Satan, to declare their desire to break with that past and build a free Iran. They marched alongside state-sanctioned rallies, before their protests were broken up violently.

For this broad coalition of democrats, America is a beacon of hope and the Iran of the street arguably the most pro-American place in the world. Earlier this year, before the huge demonstrations in the wake of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s brazen theft of the June presidential election, one popular opposition chant was, « O ba ma! »—in Farsi a play on the new American President’s last name that translates as, « He with us! »

But the opposition’s dreams of American support, moral as much as anything, have been dashed. Mr. Obama was slow and reluctant to speak out on their behalf and eager to engage the Iranian regime in nuclear talks as soon as the summer of protest tapered off. Iran’s democrats are now letting their disappointment show. The new chant passed around in Internet chat rooms and heard in the streets yesterday was, « Obama, Obama—either you’re with them or with us. »


7 juillet 2009

Bénédiction saoudienne Iran Israël Moyen-Orient Revue de presse Terrorisme

Times of London

-

Saudis give nod to Israeli raid on Iran
The Times of London

The head of Mossad, Israel’s overseas intelligence service, has assured Benjamin Netanyahu, its prime minister, that Saudi Arabia would turn a blind eye to Israeli jets flying over the kingdom during any future raid on Iran’s nuclear sites.

Earlier this year Meir Dagan, Mossad’s director since 2002, held secret talks with Saudi officials to discuss the possibility. The Israeli press has already carried unconfirmed reports that high-ranking officials, including Ehud Olmert, the former prime minister, held meetings with Saudi colleagues. The reports were denied by Saudi officials.

“The Saudis have tacitly agreed to the Israeli air force flying through their airspace on a mission which is supposed to be in the common interests of both Israel and Saudi Arabia,” a diplomatic source said last week.

John Bolton, the former US ambassador to the United Nations who recently visited the Gulf, said it was “entirely logical” for the Israelis to use Saudi airspace. Arab states would condemn a raid when they spoke at the UN but would be privately relieved to see the threat of an Iranian bomb removed, he said.


5 juillet 2009

Choisir ses amis En Images États-Unis Iran Terrorisme

Pendant que Barack Obama agit comme si le Honduras était une colonie américaine, le président démocrate conspire pour que les discussions sur la mise en place de nouvelles sanctions contre l'Iran soient retirées de l'ordre du jour du sommet du G8 qui se déroulera cette semaine en Italie. Ces sanctions étaient l'un des principaux items à l'agenda du sommet.

Barack Obama


4 juillet 2009

Même sur Al Jazeera on critique Obama États-Unis Hétu Watch Iran Moyen-Orient Terrorisme

"The substance of Obama's foreign policies in the Middle East and North Africa remain in many key areas strikingly similar to, and are in some cases more aggressive than, those of George Bush, his predecessor."

Al Jazeera
Obama's strategies failing in Iran

It took more than a week of intensified government repression against protesters in Iran before Barack Obama, the US president, moved from cautious commentary to describing the crackdown as "violent and unjust".

The acknowledged elephant in the room preventing a more robust US response to the Iranian crisis is the Anglo-American-organised coup in 1953, which overthrew Mohammed Mossadeqh, the nationalist prime minister, and brought the 33-year-old Shah, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, back to the country as unchallenged ruler.

The coup was motivated by Mossadeqh's and the Iranian parliament's decision to nationalise the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in 1951, and by the fear that Soviet-inspired communists might take over the government.

The US-sponsored overthrow of Mossadeqh and our subsequent whole-hearted support for the Shah's brutal rule are ignominious chapters in the history of US foreign policy.

But does a coup 55 years ago really disqualify the US from standing up forcefully for democracy in Iran today?

It is highly unlikely.

US policies flawed

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, do not fear the US but rather their own people's desire to live in a country more like the US.

In fact, in poll after poll Iranians have revealed themselves to be among the most pro-American and pro-democratic people in the Muslim majority world.

The Iranian government needs little excuse to beat, jail, and otherwise punish its citizens. It is already doing a thorough enough job without US interference, and seems poised to go even further. However, if it goes too far it risks "losing legitimacy in the eyes of its own people," as Obama said at a June 25 press conference.

Obama is acutely aware of the real reason why he cannot be too forceful in supporting the millions of Iranians demanding to have their votes counted. The problem is not with US administrations long past, but with the policies of the current administration.

The fact is that the US counts as its closest allies in the Middle East regimes who routinely rig elections – if they even bother to hold them at all – which produce governments that are far less legitimate than Ahmadinejad's today.

The substance of Obama's foreign policies in the Middle East and North Africa remain in many key areas strikingly similar to, and are in some cases more aggressive than, those of George Bush, his predecessor.

Saudi Arabia remains our most crucial Arab ally despite the fact that its government is among the world's most repressive and undemocratic (about which Obama has had nothing to say since becoming president).

Rather than encourage Arab democrats, the Obama administration is improving ties with Libya and returning an ambassador to Syria, where today we are courting Bashar al-Assad as a "key player" in the region, despite his country's abysmal record on human rights and democracy.

Undemocratic election techniques

In Cairo, where Obama made only a fleeting allusion to democracy during his "historic" speech last month, Hosni Mubarak, the Egyptian president, won his most recent re-election bid by deploying the usual assortment of undemocratic techniques.

Then he jailed his main opponent, Ayman Nour, for more than three years for election fraud just to make sure everyone got his point.

Yet the Obama administration, like its predecessors, regularly celebrates him as a key ally and a crucial mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Does Obama really not understand that Mubarak's interest is not in peace, but rather in an unending peace process that ensures his continued relevance and billions of dollars in no-strings-attached American aid?

Whatever his dislike for Ahmadinejad and Iran's support for Islamist militants Mubarak, and his son and potential successor Gamal, are likely breathing easier now that the protests have seemingly been repressed.

If young Iranians had succeeded in overturning a repressive and authoritarian system through massive non-violent protests, why couldn't young Egyptians have followed their example as soon as a suitable opportunity arose?

It remains a possibility that Egyptians may still find the inspiration to do so, particularly if US and European allies pressure Mubarak's government to refrain from using an Iranian or Chinese-style crackdown against Egypt's burgeoning democratic forces.

Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister who defies US wishes in the Occupied Territories without fear of suffering anything more than a mild rebuke, must also be wiping sweat from his brow.

Imagine the inspiration Iran's people power movement might have given to Palestinians to finally throw off the shackles of both a co-opted, corrupted and incompetent Palestinian Authority and the ineffectual violence of Hamas, and take matters into their own hands.

Non-violent resistance

Imagine the sight of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian men, women, and children marching to the so-called "separation wall" or innumerable Israeli check points and, like East Germans a generation ago, dismantling them apart brick by brick through disciplined non-violent action.

Consider what would happen if, instead of staying on the sidelines in Iran while playing softball with Israel and trying to woo other autocratic regimes into our orbit, Obama could look the Iranian leadership in the eyes and make the same demand of them that he should be making of all the leaders of the region: democratise and grant freedom to the peoples under your control.

At least then the brave Iranians risking their lives for democracy, and the long-repressed peoples of the region more broadly, would know that the US stands up for them.

Ultimately, it is the reality of the Obama administration's support for a discredited status quo across the region, and not the actions of the Eisenhower administration half a century ago, that makes it impossible for the US to play a forceful role advocating for democracy in Iran at this crucial moment in the history of the Islamic Republic, and ours as well.

Does Obama have the same courage to challenge our own system that Iranians have demonstrated in fighting to change theirs? And if he doesn't, do the rest of us?


1 juillet 2009

Question de même… Coup de gueule Gauchistan International Iran Québec

Trois Singes

-

Pourquoi les syndicats, la Fédération des femmes, les ONG etc. sont-ils muets à propos du mouvement pro-démocratie en Iran ? Après tout, quand vient le temps de défendre les Palestiniens, ces groupes n'hésitent pas à prendre les rues d'assaut pour manifester leur soutien de manière excessive.

Et pourquoi l'ONU a été en mesure de passer, en moins de 48 heures, une résolution condamnant la procédure légitime de destitution du président du Honduras alors que depuis 3 semaines, strictement rien n'a été fait pour condamner les violentes répressions en Iran contre le mouvement pro-démocratie ?


30 juin 2009

L’Iran et le Honduras En Vidéos États-Unis Hétu Watch International Iran

CyberpresseAu Honduras, la Constitution prévoit que les élus ne peuvent accomplir qu'un seul mandat.  La Constitution prévoit aussi que toute personne désirant changer cette loi doit d'abord quitter de ses fonctions politiques.  Manuel Zelaya, le président sortant, aimait beaucoup le pouvoir et il avait peu de respect pour les lois constitutionnelles de son pays.  Il a donc décidé d'organiser un référendum pour changer la loi et demeurer président.

La légalité de ce référendum a été contestée devant la Cour suprême du pays qui a jugé que Manuel Zelaya agissait illégalement.  Cette décision a été avalisée par le Parlement hondurien et par l'ombudsman chargé de faire respecter les droits de l'homme.

Dimanche dernier, l'armée a décidé d'exécuter le jugement de la Cour suprême et de destituer Manuel Zelaya.  Ce dernier a été remplacé par Roberto Micheletti, préalablement désigné sur une base intérimaire par le Parlement.

Depuis le début des manifestations en Iran pour protester contre la fraude électorale, Barack Obama a répété à maintes reprises qu'il ne désirait pas intervenir dans la politique intérieure de ce pays parce que l'Iran est une nation souveraine.

On aurait pu penser que la même logique allait s'appliquer au Honduras.  Hé bien non !  Obama a décidé d’ignorer la décision de la Cour suprême, du Parlement et l'ombudsman du Honduras.  Pour lui, Manuel Zelaya est encore le président légitime. Si on peut critiquer les méthodes rustres et pas très démocratiques des militaires dans cette affaire, on doit aussi se questionner sur le manque de cohérence de Barack Obama.

Et pendant ce temps, Obama dit qu'il faut respecter la souveraineté du régime iranien.  Un régime qui utilise sa « souveraineté » pour tirer sur des manifestants:

Faut pas chercher à comprendre…


28 juin 2009

Non-interventionnisme à géométrie variable États-Unis Iran Israël

Barack Obama

Depuis le début de la crise en Iran, Barack Obama a répété à maintes reprises qu'il ne désirait pas intervenir dans la politique intérieure de ce pays parce que l'Iran est une nation souveraine.

De manière parallèle, les États-Unis se sont donnés le droit d'intervenir très agressivement dans la politique intérieure d'Israël en dictant à son gouvernement le comportement qu'il devrait adopter.

Doit-on en conclure que Barack Obama respecte uniquement la souveraineté des nations brutalisant ses citoyens ?


26 juin 2009

La révolution pas si tranquille Iran Moyen-Orient Revue de presse Terrorisme

The Guardian

-

Arabs ponder implications of Iran’s unrest
The Guardian

On the other side of the Gulf, the United Arab Emirates authorities moved quickly to shut down a newspaper which ran a critical article about the repression. In Dubai, home to a huge Iranian expatriate community, protests were banned.

But in Bahrain, with a Sunni royal family, a restive Shia majority and fears of Iranian subversion, there was warm praise for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. « If he was a candidate in any Arab country against a current president, » wrote Qassim Hussain in al-Wasat, « the public would vote for him. »

In regional powerhouse Saudi Arabia, leader of the conservative Arab camp, there has been resounding public silence but private criticism – hardly surprising for an autocratic country with no political parties and where even local elections have been put on hold. Beneath the surface lies Saudi concern about possible unrest in the oil-producing Eastern province, where there is a Shia majority and a history of Iranian influence.

Unequivocal support for the Iranian regime came only from Syria – where President Bashar al-Assad won 97.6% in an uncontested referendum two years ago – and from Lebanon’s Hezbollah, whose secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, saluted Ahmadinejad’s victory as « a great hope to all the mujahideen and resistance movements who are fighting against the forces of oppression and occupation ».


23 juin 2009

Cri du coeur En Citations États-Unis Iran Terrorisme

Iran Révolution

-

Directement de Téhéran, entrevue d'un étudiant iranien avec la chaîne CNN:

"My message to the international community, especially I’m addressing President Obama directly – how can a government that doesn’t recognize its people’s rights and represses them brutally and mercilessly have nuclear activities? This government is a huge threat to global peace. Will a wise man give a sharp dagger to an insane person? We need your help international community. Don’t leave us alone."