![]() |
– |
Texte remarquable d’Ayn Rand au sujet de la désobéissance civile: « There is no justification, in a civilized society, for the kind of mass civil disobedience that involves the violation of the rights of others—regardless of whether the demonstrators’ goal is good or evil. The end does not justify the means. No one’s rights can be secured by the violation of the rights of others. Mass disobedience is an assault on the concept of rights: it is a mob’s defiance of legality as such. The forcible occupation of another man’s property or the obstruction of a public thoroughfare is so blatant a violation of rights that an attempt to justify it becomes an abrogation of morality. An individual has no right to do a “sit-in” in the home or office of a person he disagrees with—and he does not acquire such a right by joining a gang. Rights are not a matter of numbers—and there can be no such thing, in law or in morality, as actions forbidden to an individual, but permitted to a mob. The only power of a mob, as against an individual, is greater muscular strength—i.e., plain, brute physical force. The attempt to solve social problems by means of physical force is what a civilized society is established to prevent. The advocates of mass civil disobedience admit that their purpose is intimidation. A society that tolerates intimidation as a means of settling disputes—the physical intimidation of some men or groups by others—loses its moral right to exist as a social system, and its collapse does not take long to follow. » |
Oh Malaf ces mots entre-il dans ton crane? Mr le nombre justifie l’usage de force pour imposer son point de vue.
Hmm… Et quoi faire quand la violation de nos droits (comme les lois Jim Crowe) est sous approbration de l’État?
D’accord avec lemoutongris. Que fait-on lorsque les lois adoptés par l’État briment nos droits les plus fondamentaux. Le mouvement des droits civiques aux États-Unis par exemple…
Un autre extrait du texte de Rand (que je n’ai pas pu tout retranscrire à cause de l’Espace disponible):
Civil disobedience may be justifiable, in some cases, when and if an individual disobeys a law in order to bring an issue to court, as a test case. Such an action involves respect for legality and a protest directed only at a particular law which the individual seeks an opportunity to prove to be unjust. The same is true of a group of individuals when and if the risks involved are their own.
Merci de partager. Je connaissais pas ce texte.