Voici ce que les médias vous ont caché sur le conflit entre Gaza et Israël:
L’art de la guerre selon le Hamas…
Marchands d’armes (I) 
Certains vendent, d'autres achètent*…
Voilà qui remet en question quelques idées reçues.
*Les montants sont exprimés en dollar constant de 1990
Source:
Importer/Exporter TIV Tables
100 jours plus tard (I) 
Barack Obama est le président des États-Unis depuis 100 jours.
Résultat ? Depuis 40 ans, jamais ce pays n'a été si divisé:
Pour quelqu'un qui avait promis d'unir le pays, c'est un échec retentissant.
P.-S. Pour la 2e fois en 5 ans, les républicains devancent les démocrates dans les sondages. Ils ont maintenant une priorité de 3 pts. Lors de l'assermentation de Barack Obama, les démocrates avaient une avance de 7 pts sur les républicains.
Source:
Partisan Gap in Obama Job Approval Widest in Modern Era
Droits torturés 
|
– |
Obama administration seeks to change questioning law The Obama administration is urging the US Supreme Court to overturn a landmark decision that stops police from questioning suspects unless they have a lawyer present. The effort to sweep aside the 23-year-old Michigan vs Jackson ruling is one of several moves by the new government to have dismayed civil rights groups. President Barack Obama has already provoked controversy by backing the continued imprisonment without trial of enemy combatants in Afghanistan and by limiting the rights of prisoners to challenge evidence used to convict them. The Michigan vs Jackson ruling in 1986 established that, if a defendants have a lawyer or have asked for one to be present, police may not interview them until the lawyer is present. Any such questioning cannot be used in court even if the suspect agrees to waive his right to a lawyer because he would have made that decision without legal counsel, said the Supreme Court. The sixth amendment of the US constitution protects the right of criminal suspects to be “represented by counsel”, but the Obama regime argues that this merely means to “protect the adversary process” in a criminal trial. Critics argue that the 1986 decision is important to protect vulnerable defendants such as the mentally disabled, poor or juveniles who could be easily swayed by the police. |