9 juin 2007

Hatikvah Israël Palestine Terrorisme

Il y a des ironies qui sont difficiles à passer sous silence…

Aujourd'hui, la Fédération autonome du collégial (FAC) participait à une manifestation visant à dénoncer "l'occupation" israélienne:

Fédération autonome du collégial
La FAC joint sa voix aux organisations qui dénoncent l’occupation de la Palestine

Réunis en assemblée fédérative, les déléguées et délégués des syndicats membres de la Fédération autonome du collégial (FAC) ont joint leurs voix à celles de tous ceux qui, à travers le monde, dénoncent l’occupation israélienne de la Palestine et exigent le retrait des troupes des territoires palestiniens occupés. […]

Ces quarante années d’occupation se sont traduites par le décès ou l’exil de milliers de Palestiniens et de Palestiniennes. Elles ont aussi favorisé la construction systématique de colonies juives et, plus récemment, du mur de la honte qui sépare les cultivateurs de leurs terres, les élèves de leur école, les gens de leur communauté. L’occupation s’est également manifestée par la négation systématique des droits des Palestiniens et des Palestiniennes à l’éducation, à la santé et à l’eau.

Quarante années d’occupation : c’est assez ! Israël doit mettre fin immédiatement à l’occupation, respecter le droit international, entre autres en prêtant assistance aux personnes affligées.

L'ironie ?

Il se trouve que des palestiniens commencent à être nostalgique de l'époque où Israël contrôlait la bande Gaza:

Palestinians say fed up with gunmen

Now, frequent internal fighting and lawlessness gripping the Palestinian territories have transformed the militants into no more than gangsters in the eyes of many of those who once saw them as heroes.

"It's very ironic but I'm relieved the Israelis have started a bombing campaign. The gunmen killing each other on the streets were forced to go into hiding," said Mai, a Gaza housewife, referring to strikes aimed at halting rocket attacks on Israel.

Nasser Jum'a, once a leading member of Fatah's al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, said ordinary Palestinians were so fed up with the armed groups "they now wish the Israeli occupation would take over in Gaza or hope for the return of Jordanian rule in the West Bank" to get rid of them.

Pour prêter assistance aux personnes affligées, il se trouve qu'Israël devrait probablement occuper de nouveau le territoire…  Et si "l'Autorité" Palestinienne a besoin de conseil pour savoir comment traiter avec ses terroristes, ils peuvent toujours demander conseil à Israël.

Au fait, vous pensez que la FAC fera une manifestation pour dénoncer les actes terroristes des groupes armées palestiniens ?

9 juin 2007

Avant qu’il ne soit trop tard États-Unis Iran Israël Terrorisme

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

"The only thing worse than bombing Iran, is allowing Iran to get the bomb."

The Wall Street Journal
The Case for Bombing Iran


Although many persist in denying it, I continue to believe that what Sept 11, 2001, did was to plunge us headlong into nothing less than another world war. I call this new war World War IV, because I also believe that what is generally known as the Cold War was actually World War III, and that this one bears a closer resemblance to that great conflict than it does to World War II. Like the Cold War, as the military historian Eliot Cohen was the first to recognize, the one we are now in has ideological roots, pitting us against Islamofascism, yet another mutation of the totalitarian disease we defeated first in the shape of Nazism and fascism and then in the shape of communism; it is global in scope; it is being fought with a variety of weapons, not all of them military; and it is likely to go on for decades.

What follows from this way of looking at the last five years is that the military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq cannot be understood if they are regarded as self-contained wars in their own right. Instead we have to see them as fronts or theaters that have been opened up in the early stages of a protracted global struggle. The same thing is true of Iran. As the currently main center of the Islamofascist ideology against which we have been fighting since 9/11, and as (according to the State Department's latest annual report on the subject) the main sponsor of the terrorism that is Islamofascism's weapon of choice, Iran too is a front in World War IV. Moreover, its effort to build a nuclear arsenal makes it the potentially most dangerous one of all.

The Iranians, of course, never cease denying that they intend to build a nuclear arsenal, and yet in the same breath they openly tell us what they intend to do with it. Their first priority, as repeatedly and unequivocally announced by their president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is to "wipe Israel off the map"–a feat that could not be accomplished by conventional weapons alone. […]

Bernard Lewis, the greatest authority of our time on the Islamic world, has to say in this context on the subject of deterrence:

  • MAD, mutual assured destruction, [was effective] right through the cold war. Both sides had nuclear weapons. Neither side used them, because both sides knew the other would retaliate in kind. This will not work with a religious fanatic [like Ahmadinejad]. For him, mutual assured destruction is not a deterrent, it is an inducement. We know already that [Iran's leaders] do not give a damn about killing their own people in great numbers. We have seen it again and again. In the final scenario, and this applies all the more strongly if they kill large numbers of their own people, they are doing them a favor. They are giving them a quick free pass to heaven and all its delights.

Nor are they inhibited by a love of country:

  • "We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world."

These were the words of the Ayatollah Khomeini, who ruled Iran from 1979 to 1989, and there is no reason to suppose that his disciple Ahmadinejad feels any differently.

Still less would deterrence work where Israel was concerned. For as the Ayatollah Rafsanjani (who is supposedly a "pragmatic conservative") has declared:

  • "If a day comes when the world of Islam is duly equipped with the arms Israel has in possession . . . application of an atomic bomb would not leave anything in Israel, but the same thing would just produce damages in the Muslim world."

In other words, Israel would be destroyed in a nuclear exchange, but Iran would survive. […]

In short, the plain and brutal truth is that if Iran is to be prevented from developing a nuclear arsenal, there is no alternative to the actual use of military force–any more than there was an alternative to force if Hitler was to be stopped in 1938. […]

The only thing worse than bombing Iran, McCain has declared, is allowing Iran to get the bomb. […]

Much of the world has greeted Ahmadinejad's promise to wipe Israel off the map with something close to insouciance. In fact, it could almost be said of the Europeans that they have been more upset by Ahmadinejad's denial that a Holocaust took place 60 years ago than by his determination to set off one of his own as soon as he acquires the means to do so. In some of European countries, Holocaust denial is a crime, and the European Union only recently endorsed that position. Yet for all their retrospective remorse over the wholesale slaughter of Jews back then, the Europeans seem no readier to lift a finger to prevent a second Holocaust than they were the first time around.

Not so George W. Bush, a man who knows evil when he sees it and who has demonstrated an unfailingly courageous willingness to endure vilification and contumely in setting his face against it. It now remains to be seen whether this president, battered more mercilessly and with less justification than any other in living memory, and weakened politically by the enemies of his policy in the Middle East in general and Iraq in particular, will find it possible to take the only action that can stop Iran from following through on its evil intentions both toward us and toward Israel. As an American and as a Jew, I pray with all my heart that he will.